I'm sure we're thinking more about these topics - time-locking and multi-sig \ stacker news ~bitcoin

With the price run-up recently, I know we're all thinking more about self-custodial security, and how to make it hard for someone to kidnap you and force you to give up your sats.

Let's start the discussion.

Anyone thinking of setting up multi-sig? Pros/cons? How about time-locking? In a $5 wrench attack - which is better? Both? How do you prove to potential attackers that your bitcoin is in a time-locked multi-sig - is that even possible? What are some of the best tools for improved security? Looks like time-locking is actually built in to Sparrow currently.

Here's a couple previous Stacker News posts on security topics that I thought were relevant:

BitVaulty: Your Bitcoin Security Reinvented Some thoughts on the game theory that results from btc wealth Time Locked Multisig: A New Dimension In Self Custody

40 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 11 Nov

Would be funny if suddenly covenants become more interesting.

34 sats \ 1 reply \ @denlillaapan 14 Nov

What, nothing? Crickets

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Signal312 OP 15 Nov

I know, right? I was expecting heated discussion, lots of ideas.

34 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 11 Nov

@remindme in 3 days

YES FUCKING need this convo and all the advice there is. Got my multisig out of Unchained... not worth the opportunity cost of the ~400,000 sats I'd have to fork out!