I remember when all this stuff was starting, a relative told me about how great he thought it was that his work meetings were now starting with everyone declaring their pronouns.
I have no animus towards the pronoun people, but I am a cold economist at heart, so what struck me was how enormous the collective time drain would be if every meeting had to start with such declarations.
one of my best friends growing up later came out as transgender... and she never 'says' her pronouns. she's just a she and its cool nobody cares
there are transgender people, and then there are the politicians. they are not the same.
best i can tell, transgender people and their identities have existed for thousands of years. it is not a recent political development, but some kind of medical condition. my 2 sats
reply
I suspect that most gender dysphoric people just want to be left alone to live their life without discrimination, and don't appreciate being used as a political football.
I do think, however, that transgenderism has become a fad and that the current rates of "non-binary" self-identification are way above historical rates. I also suspect that it's the ones who are doing this as part of a fad that are the loudest about pronouns.
reply
it's interesting and i don't know. what you said though is probably right.
people like my friend 'came out' before most people had ever heard of pronouns etc and those most deeply motivated by who they are, are the most quiet about it. +1 we need to find common ground
reply
48 sats \ 1 reply \ @moonbeetle 7h
I don’t this idea that transgender people need to be quiet about who they are to be valid in their identity is true. Just as there are people who are loud sports fans, there are people who engage more quietly. They’re all sports fans.
I do think this sentiment about AOC is important though, as it speaks to how inauthentic left politicians are. The pronouns cater to a particular group she wants to align with, and when this no longer serves her she can remove them as she pleases. This identity swapping is something that legitimate members of a group cannot do. One cannot remove their queerness, just as one cannot make themselves queer.
I’m probably an example of think of when they imagine a leftist, though I don’t like to hard align myself with any particular political ideology and I’m constantly also looking to find common ground. I don’t find arguing over politics to be as rewarding as I once did, now I see it more as everyone vs the government as opposed to left vs right.
But I’ve always more or less believed that most people mean well. In my personal life I address people as they would like to be addressed, as to me it seems the bare minimum. We have so little control over so many things in our lives, personal identity should always be in the hands of the individual.
I’m aware many will probably disagree with some of my stances, but I hope you will take them with the light heartednedd I intended. I am always open to discussion and learning.
reply
They need to be quiet because they are annoying and shrill. Their entire identity is gender fluidity.
reply
Did your friend join antifa?
reply
nope.
reply
210 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 5h
He should He will fit right in
reply
33 percent of antifa members identify as transgender.
These militant douche bags need a taste of their own destructive medicine. Especially in Oregon
reply
I agree and if someone is presenting/living as a woman, I’m just going to use female pronouns, regardless of what I may know or suspect about the person.
reply
He*
reply
502 sats \ 2 replies \ @Bell_curve 8h
Transgenders are mentally ill and unstable and some are very dangerous. The dangerous ones need to be eradicated
reply
77 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 8h
The dangerous ones need to be eradicated
You sound pretty dangerous
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 5h
You sound fake
Pearl clutching is annoying
You must love antifa @ek
reply
Meetings are already painful
reply
Have you had to sit through a Land Acknowledgment?
They're really shooting themselves in the foot because regular people see this for what it is: empty, performative virtue signaling, and a waste of everyone's time.
reply
Thankfully, no. They happen regularly at one of my previous universities, but didn't start until I had moved on. They sound excruciating.
reply
what the hell is a land acknowledgement?
reply
It's a little sermon about how we're all on stolen land, but we're not going to do anything crazy like give it back (that last part isn't usually said).
reply
interesting. never heard of that although i have been out of school/university for a while
i take a neutral point of view to most things like this - if it makes people feel better and it gives them closure... then ok. its not going to matter anyway
reply
The problem is I don't think Native Americans are the ones pushing for land acknowledgments. At least, not the majority of them. This is an invention of liberal academia, much like the term "Latinx" which is proven to be disliked by the average Hispanic person.
"If it makes people feel better and gives them closure"..... but who are we trying to make feel better? Liberal academics?
reply
If you’re not paying property tax, there is nothing to acknowledge
reply
😂
reply