pull down to refresh

21 sats \ 3 replies \ @zapsammy 20h
do u think that this graph is accurate for world-wide view of people regarding bitcoin? i believe that the actual graph is skewed to the right (i.e. the peak is further to the left, longer tail to the right). this is from my everyday experience locally, so maybe that's only my locale distribution.
reply
It’s just a dumb meme I made lol. But according to op only 1% of the global population has ever used it, so there’s probably a sub-group of people, “Bitcoin is NGU technology but i don’t care about the far reaching consequences” 1 or 2 SDs above the average. If you’re thinking like op as in Bitcoin is still early you’re probably among the 0.1% or third standard deviation above average.
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @zapsammy 19h
i don't think of bitcoin as money only; money is only one function that this technology can fulfill. furthermore, i think the idea of money as we know it has to become obsolete, eliminated. value in its original meaning is a much better term, imho. value as in what gives people strength, valor.
reply
37 sats \ 0 replies \ @dk OP 17h
I like the idea of reimagining what value means to us. I would describe value (or even money) as a coordinated record to help people collaborate on a planetary scale.
Money today is an attempt to track the contributions and debts that are given/owed to people by society/civilization.
Unfortunately, the major systems in use are not very transparent or easily interoperable at a planetary scale. So moving to a more transparent and neutral system of record keeping will be foundational for improving transparency at higher-built layers.
reply