pull down to refresh

33 sats \ 2 replies \ @sethforprivacy OP 22 Nov \ parent \ on: I'm Seth For Privacy, freedom maximalist and VP of Cake Wallet - AMA! AMA
Of course, thanks for the great question :)
write
preview
this territory is moderated
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 22 Nov
Btw, I've updated my comment with a question about silent payments, not sure if you've seen it before you replied.
But I think the same answer applies: monero is still easier to use privately than bitcoin with silent payments, am I right?
reply
343 sats \ 0 replies \ @sethforprivacy OP 22 Nov
Ah, no, I didn't see that! They're definitely a good fit for DNMs as they can really simplify the address UX and cut down on the need for server infra.
However, they don't work right now with multisig (they require MuSig) so it will be some time before it's technically possible for them to use on multisig-backed platforms.
To clarify though -- Silent Payments are really a UX improvement that merely improves privacy by enforcing the "no address reuse" basic privacy practice on Bitcoin w/o requiring extra server infra.
reply