pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @joda 6h \ parent \ on: IMF and El Salvador bitcoin
Are you perhaps into Monero or, by your tone I would guess BCH?
6102 may be a real threat; it's really hard to say. I'm not worried so much about direct confiscation, as it would be entirely the obligation of the government to prove that you own (and control) any. It could however be made much more illegal to accept it or transact generally.
The common argument, among others, is that this would put the United States at a disadvantage as other countries would shift to using it and de-dollarize.
I don't think you'll find a lot of NGU peeps here. The range is pretty much libertarian to anarchist, or at least those are the outspoken ones. I think most people here want to own Bitcoin, own assets, or spend Bitcoin to get assets.
Not a holder of Monero or BCH.
I searched NGU on duckduckgo and all that came up was some urinary tract infection- otherwise not sure what you mean by that term.
Yes Libertarians are loud on here. Not sure what the connection is but few on here seem to understand that without Bitcoin being used much as a p2p payments protocol it is at real risk of becoming a speculative commodity plaything and easily controlled by the legacy fiat debt slavery cartel operators- in fact this is exactly what is happening.
So much for the revolution as soon as greed stepped in...
reply