Good point. Doing so might allow you to fit another pubkey in the script, or maybe more than one, and make the n-of-n larger than a 67 of 67.

Ah you were talking about the CHECKSIG ADD thing. You might as well use CHECKSIGVERIFY for n-of-n.

moonsettler

If you don't have n-of-n, might as well be using fedi

You do. If you want a 67-of-67, just set m to 67

this is cringe and you are being pedantic for no good reason

I agree, but I'm having fun so that's a reason

Taproot made clArk practically viable to a certain scale where Ark might make sense at

IMO it would have made perfectly good sense even before taproot. But no one thought of it

bitcoin

LNhance - A soft fork proposal for bitcoin

> If you don't have n-of-n, might as well be using fedi

You do. If you want a 67-of-67, just set m to 67

> this is cringe and you are being pedantic for no good reason

I agree, but I'm having fun so that's a reason

> Taproot made clArk practically viable to a certain scale where Ark might make sense at

IMO it would have made perfectly good sense even before taproot. But no one thought of it