pull down to refresh

58 sats \ 2 replies \ @supertestnet 27 Dec 2024 \ parent \ on: LNhance - A soft fork proposal for bitcoin bitcoin
If you don't have n-of-n, might as well be using fedi
You do. If you want a 67-of-67, just set m to 67
this is cringe and you are being pedantic for no good reason
I agree, but I'm having fun so that's a reason
Taproot made clArk practically viable to a certain scale where Ark might make sense at
IMO it would have made perfectly good sense even before taproot. But no one thought of it
write
preview
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @moonsettler OP 6 Jan
Ah you were talking about the CHECKSIG ADD thing. You might as well use CHECKSIGVERIFY for n-of-n.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @supertestnet 6 Jan
Good point. Doing so might allow you to fit another pubkey in the script, or maybe more than one, and make the n-of-n larger than a 67 of 67.
reply