pull down to refresh
41 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 28 Dec \ parent \ on: Why Did the Accuser in the Duke Lacrosse Case Recant? Some Answers Politics_And_Law
I don’t know how they are doing now. I haven’t heard. This is the problem with “always believe the woman”. I think you see a lot of it going on in family courts, too. I guess dishonesty has a reward and as long as someone is paying it, there will be dishonesty. Until strong, adversarial cross-examinations are allowed, there will be lies.