pull down to refresh

I am sure it will come. Like with the meta takeover, we are trying to skate where the puck is going here.
I have some broader thoughts on territories and territory ownership that I will probably talk more about later this year but that really had nothing to do with this arrangement.
Undisciplined and I will discuss it more on the pod but for me it had more to do with recognizing talent, contribution and potential benefit to the territory, myself and Undisciplined for the future and ensuring since he had become such a big part of what we were doing with the territory that he had some skin in the game if he wanted it.
82 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek 4 Jun
Just came here from #996861 and saw that I must have read this before but only zapped 100 sats
Like with the meta takeover, we are trying to skate where the puck is going here.
Love what you guys are doing, keep it up and sorry for being slow with the updates. We’ll have some pretty big releases soon to make up for it. 👀
reply
Auto-revenue splits? Cross-posting? What? What?
reply
89 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 4 Jun
Better wallets by me in this PR.
With my changes, we will actually show wallets, and not a mix of wallets and protocols. That should make it a lot less confusing for stackers because they can just search for a wallet they have, instead of having to know what protocols the wallets they have support.
@k00b is working on better payments here.
What might be interesting in there for you:
  • you can now pay partially in CCs and sats
  • real-time territory revenue
Once we combine @k00b's changes with my changes, we can also implement non-custodial forwards a lot easier since currently, they are always CCs.
And most likely also auto-revenue splits since it's essentially a forwarded payment, but I guess we need to support territory co-founders first.
reply
real-time territory revenue
Meaning revenue with each post/comment/zap in our territory? That's pretty cool.
How many CC's are floating around SN at any given time?
reply
62 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 4 Jun
Meaning revenue with each post/comment/zap in our territory? That's pretty cool.
Yes!
How many CC's are floating around SN at any given time?
We want to include this in the analytics
reply
109 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 4 Jun
Basically, the changes I’m making, when I can find enough time around code review and finding good links, produce a single unified ledger for SN (when we were custodial the entire db was effectively a ledger … because money would come/go to custodial wallets … now there are 3 kinds of sources of funds potentially and 3 kinds of sinks, CCs, rewards sats, wallets … and wallets are crazy because they settle at a nondeterministic time, sometimes hours after we first record them).
Anyway, this ledger will allow analytics/satistics to be ideal in terms of detail like “how many CCs there are” or “how many CCs are spent on what in which territory.” It will also allow, given its flexibility, more complicated financial relationships between actions/stackers.
We sort of swapped out the foundation of SN with a kind of hodgepodge of stuff when we made the custodial switch - it works but it doesn’t allow the building to keep getting taller without a new, proper foundation.
For my part, I'm simply a terrible negotiator who meets offers like this with "Yes, please. No takebacks! How much do I owe you?"
reply
You negotiated a fine deal for yourself with me. With Jeff, not so much. That was a lot of contingencies for a guy that wanted to get out. Haha.
But I am confident it will work out well for you regardless.
reply