pull down to refresh

There are a lot of scammers who only post on SN to win contests and zap each other so they are just assmilking us, so we decided to use CCs for them. We will also decrease the bounty soon.
Sorry that honest stackers also suffer from that decision. But 10k sats at current prices for memes or facts was too much anyway.
I have another question, how many Cowboy credits are in circulation? How many of them will exist in total?
We'll show that in analytics soon so everybody can see that the supply does not necessarily increase but can also decrease since 30% of each zap is "burned" for territory revenue and rewards.
26 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 7 Jan
We didn't "decide" to use CCs for them really. It's just a consequence of the changes because the bot that pays them can only use CCs without further changes.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 7 Jan
Ah, yes, sorry
reply
I understand
reply
If 30% of zaps, including CC zaps, gets converted into revenue and rewards, which can be paid out in sats, would it be correct to say that CC are like sat IOUs (i.e. SN backs them with real sats), but with the caveat that users can't simply redeem them for sats, they only become sats under special conditions (like payouts of revenue and rewards)?
reply
I think it's better to stop the contests! I understand the decision.
reply
I thought so too
reply
so... trust, don't verify?
reply
Yes, I had read about the reduction in the sats reward value, I even thought that starting this Monday it would be a smaller reward.
Oh, I see, they're cheating. Is there a way to set conditions for participation? For example, only those who have made X amount of posts (of value) in the week can participate?
reply
ek, I am just curious, do you have an idea who the scammers are?
reply
I think it's obvious if you look closely.
reply
You can see their nyms, but I am asking if he knows who created those accounts. That is the question I am curious about.
reply
@DarthCoin has a better eye for that
reply