reply on: Frequently Asked Questions \ stacker news ~bitcoin

pull down to refresh

13 sats \ 4 replies \ @k00b OP 19 Jan \ parent \ on: Frequently Asked Questions bitcoin

poster/commenter receives 70% of the zap amount
of the remaining 30%, 70% goes to the territory founder and the remaining 30% goes to the rewards pool

So for a 1000 sat zap: 700 sats go to poster/commenter, 210 sats go to the territory founder, 90 sats go to the rewards pool.

The fee breakdown doesn’t change whether you’re using direct lightning or cowboy credits. Lightning vs CCs only affects what the poster/commenter receives.

If you have a sending wallet attached and are zapping people who have a receiving wallet attached, we will send sats if it’s possible even if you have CCs. For zaps, we prioritize you spending sats if possible, otherwise we fallback to CCs. For everything else, we prioritize you spending CCs.

181 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 19 Jan

I have to admit I have more sat and fewer CC than I expected and I have no problem with CC!

I have even offered to buy CC from disgruntled SN users.

I have purchased CC in exchange for sat from one SN user.

13 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 19 Jan

I have 16 CCs currently. We have a lot of work to do to make it better and easier for unmotivated and non-technical people to receive/send sats easily, but it's not a world ending calamity.

63 sats \ 1 reply \ @jamalderrick 19 Jan

Ok. So it sounds like CCs are prioritized for comments primarily. Is that the way to think about it?

13 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 19 Jan

If you primarily comment, then yes. To be clear, CCs are prioritized for posting/commenting/boost/territory fees/donations. Basically ANY time you're paying SN money (not other stackers), we prioritize CCs. Anytime you're paying other stackers, we prioritize sats if possible.