pull down to refresh

I think these are total figures, not just for you.
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @sox 7 Feb
They are total figures indeed ^^
reply
But it says spent... I assumed it was spent by me.
reply
0 sats \ 10 replies \ @sox 7 Feb
If you think about it, you can sum the sats on posts and add the post cost for each: you'd get ~6309 sats
reply
I wonder how the downzaps are counted in that total
reply
21 sats \ 5 replies \ @sox 7 Feb
I wonder how the downzaps are counted in that total
Edit: It will increase the 'spent' value
reply
goood is even more confusing hahahahaha
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @sox 7 Feb
Weeeeeeell I caused the confusion here because I had a brainfart, edited the post accordingly
But there are only two posts in the territory. 420 sats each.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @sox 7 Feb
people spent sats on zaps though, even in comments
reply
huh... okay, guess that's it, the total zaps plus cost to post
reply