pull down to refresh

[REVENUE] 1814 sats - Two days in a row crushing it 💪💪
243 sats \ 26 comments \ @realBitcoinDog 24 Feb HealthAndFitness
But the comments are what matter!
write
preview
related posts
158 sats \ 17 replies \ @IamSINGLE 24 Feb
I recalculated the revenue and it's 2249 sats for yesterday not 1814.
I counted the values for ~healthandfitness as following
  • Post fee = 69
  • Comment fee = 7
  • Zaps = 21% of total sats zapped
So, yesterday's stats stand as:
  • posts = 6×69=414 Sats
  • comm.= 66×7=462 Sats
  • zaps = 6641%21 = 1373 Sats
  • Total = 2249 Sats in revenue.
*This also doesn't include fees and zaps on previous days' posts or comments. If it does, the revenue could be more. CC: @grayruby @Undisciplined @realBitcoinDog @k00b @ek
Please correct me if I'm wrong at it.
reply
93 sats \ 5 replies \ @IamSINGLE 25 Feb
Today's calculation.
54 comments = 378 Sats revenue 5 posts = 345 sats revenue Zaps = 2568•21% = 539 Total = 1262 Sats.
Zaps breakdown
@grayruby @Undisciplined @realBitcoinDog
reply
35 sats \ 4 replies \ @realBitcoinDog OP 25 Feb
Not what I got just now
reply
43 sats \ 3 replies \ @IamSINGLE 25 Feb
It's 107 Sats less. It also doesn't include any zaps that cod have happened on any other posts than yesterday's. There's something missing and noone's from the admins even bothered to address it.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 25 Feb
I'll be back thursday. I'll investigate when I get back. ek is/has been taking personal time.
the admins even bothered to address it
This isn't exactly motivating. You've memorably been a huge asshole to me. Don't expect prompt service.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @IamSINGLE 25 Feb
I expected just a reply not service.
You've memorably been a huge asshole to me.
No bigger than some here are. ;)
And I'm extremely sorry for calling you the emperor (or, may be the king). At the most that's what I can remember memorably.
reply on another page
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 25 Feb
@k00b's on vacation, still. Not sure about @ek.
I suggest making a ~meta post about this, so the other owners can look into their revenue.
reply
38 sats \ 6 replies \ @grayruby 24 Feb
Did you base yesterday on 12am ct to 12am ct?
reply
61 sats \ 2 replies \ @IamSINGLE 24 Feb
I don't know how to do it. I calculated from 11:30AM IST to 11:30AM IST round the clock.
There were 6 posts, 66 comments and 6641 sats zapped within them on this timeframe.
11:30 AM IST is the time when rewards are distributed.
Edit: I've checked that 11:30 IST happens to be 12:AM CT, so I actually set the time.
I calculated from post to post and comment to comment within this timeframe.
reply
19 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 24 Feb
A good test would be to track today’s and see if there is another anomaly.
reply
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @IamSINGLE 24 Feb
This sounds ok. I'll do it again tomorrow at day end.
reply
20 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 24 Feb
I don't think you can set the time, so maybe it is a time-zone issue.
reply
76 sats \ 1 reply \ @IamSINGLE 24 Feb
We simply don't need to set the time as I calculated right after the day ended at 12:AM CT or 11:30 IST for me.
I only calculated for the posts and comments and zaps that were made only yesterday within the timeframe of 24 hours.
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 24 Feb
Can @realBitcoinDog check that the formula works as intended with his forked SN?
reply
19 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined 24 Feb
Might some of the zaps occurred today, rather than yesterday?
reply
47 sats \ 2 replies \ @IamSINGLE 24 Feb
No. I calculated it right after the day ended. I even posted it 9 h ago. #895470
You know I and @realBitcoinDog discuss the analytics daily. It happened that I intuitively guessed that we must have a better day than yesterday as I saw more zaps, comments and posts than the previous day. But when I saw him posting the revenue less than the day before yesterday, I was just surprised and did this calculation.
I'm not entirely sure if my method of calculation is completely correct but the stats are 100% correct.
reply
19 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 24 Feb
Interesting, because your method looks right to me.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @realBitcoinDog OP 25 Feb
Not what I got tho
reply
31 sats \ 6 replies \ @IamSINGLE 24 Feb
Considering we have the top post and lot more in zaps, I was hoping for more revenue than yesterday's. We need to calculate it on our own.
I'm gonna do it.
reply
10 sats \ 5 replies \ @realBitcoinDog OP 24 Feb
Did we have the top post?!
Omg you’re right it was @denlillaapan!!
#895198
reply
31 sats \ 3 replies \ @IamSINGLE 24 Feb
My calculation says we should have at least 2100 sats. It's 300 sats more.
I counted 21% of all the zaps and 70% of all the fees.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @realBitcoinDog OP 24 Feb
Fine w/ me for u to bring it up to the boss!
Cuz it should all be Sats right? No CC’s
reply
31 sats \ 1 reply \ @IamSINGLE 24 Feb
No. As far as I know. Sats and CCs make no difference in this regard. Maybe there's something else.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @IamSINGLE 24 Feb
I recalculated and it's now 2249 sats. Ok my method is:
Total revenue for ~healthandfitness=
  • Post fee = 69
  • Comment fee = 7
  • Zaps = 21% of total sats zapped
Today's stats:
posts = 6×69=414 comm.= 66×7=462 zaps = 6641%21 = 1373
Total = 2249
*This doesn't include fees and zaps on previous posts or comments. It should be more.
@k00b Are we missing something?
reply on another page
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 24 Feb
Craaaaaazy
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @LibertasBR 24 Feb
Congrats! Im happy to be part of it.
reply