pull down to refresh
No, only minority. We looked this up for Undisc for when he's acquiring the magazine
RE: Ownership?
Estates bigger than most countries don't divest of media assets, they use ratholes and trade to obfuscate ownership.
Sure whatever. But then the burden of proof is on you to show me that claim.
Can't just blanket say that akschually there's something else going on
You're the one going ackshually they divested some of it but can't prove they surrendered control.
Nothing I said is incorrect, it being a Rothschild rag is an undisputed historical fact.
How do I prove a negative, asshole?
Largest owner is the FIAT (car) guy. It would seem Rothschilds are not the biggest owner.
Control? Go look inside the business. Can't just blanket "uh, duuuh it's the Jew!"
You can't, so maybe the ackshually they divested some of it was a stupid thing to say when you seemingly know full well its history?
I linked it on SN like three days ago. Public info. Go Google yourself before you out yourself as retarded
So you admit I'm correct and you're retard ackshually, your own screenshot confirms that it is a Rothschild owned rag.
Sounds like the kind of article a nihilist loser uses to confirm their bias.
Should also note that the Economist is a Rothschild owned rag, the same Rothschild dynasty that needs people of the west give up hope, get in pods, and eat ze damn bugs.