pull down to refresh

Take the L and remove the post. It is completely inaccurate and misleading.
reply
Then it should be a warm invite to forkers to lay out their math on how many users need to be accommodated, shouldn't it?
Even off as I was, it stands that supply distribution is the scaling limitation, not the absence of centralized transaction pooling toward completely unquantified scaling virtue signals
reply
17 sats \ 3 replies \ @moneyball 6h
I agree it is an interesting framework. But most people seem misled by the title. So maybe edit?
reply
I would if I could, cc @k00b
Good to see the conceptual interest, a v2 might be warranted with detailed introspection into possible supply distribution scenarios...
Scarcity is so insane its impossible to truly account for the fact that every person with more than 20k sats is removing exponential numbers of other people from the user-candidate pool
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 5h
Edit windows are limited to 10m until we add perpetual edits.
Closest thing IMO would be to write a comment with revisions, click ..., and pin the comment to the top of the thread.
reply
pinned comments sound like a good solution