pull down to refresh

TL:DR
As President Donald Trump pulls back on green funding, state officials are lobbying Congress to retain those dollars for other infrastructure projects that would be more palatable to the current administration and Republicans, like road and bridge repairs.
Republicans negotiating the nation’s next big infrastructure bill seem amenable to the idea, as long as it means they can move funding away from green projects and toward “traditional” ones.
“That’s laying asphalt, pouring concrete, building bridges and building roads,” said House Transportation and Infrastructure Chairman Sam Graves, R-Mo., in an interview. “Not environmental justice and Green New Deal mandates and all of these other things” found in the 2021 infrastructure law that funded billions of dollars in Biden-era priorities.
That bill, which expires in 2026, began as a typical surface transportation reauthorization bill but was greatly expanded by $550 billion in new spending.
Graves has said that his upcoming version will be scaled back.
State officials argue that there’s a way to pull back in scope without cutting funding, which they say has been essential for projects in their areas.
“Without [the infrastructure law],states would have had to scale back projects due to the rising cost of inflation,” said Jim Tymon, executive director of nonprofit American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, in an interview. “A new surface transportation bill aligns with the administration’s priorities as well as those of both chambers of Congress,” with the prior bill establishing a “baseline” for future funding.
[….]

My Thoughts 💭

I am not against this. Green technology and energy sounds great in theory but in reality it’s still too damn expensive!! But the infrastructure in the United States can use more investment to repair and modernize.
I could see them getting some of it back, but there might really be some 4-D chess going on with this administration. I'm in the middle of a podcast explaining how they're planning on using rescission to not have to spend all of the congressionally approved funds.
Apparently, there's a difference between how Congress allocates funding in a budget and how they approve spending in a continuing resolution. The executive branch can't reallocate budget to other purposes, but they are allowed to not spend all of the approved funds from a CR.
Long story short, they might have passed a bloated CR with the intention of rescissioning a bunch of money into reducing the deficit or buying crypto or whatever.
reply
This is practically like taking money out of one pocket and putting it in the other.
reply