That’s right, but the only shared value we need is not violating what are normally referred to as private property rights. 

I'm with you.

> Absent that, the lifestyle wouldn't be feasible

Unfortunately, I don't think we get there without a shared set of ethical principles regarding individuals' rights and freedoms,

These are being eroded day by day in this country.

unschooled

BooksAndArticles

Re-broaching an old question: private property - 'natural' or 'acquired' right?

> allowing him to lead this lifestyle provided he peacefully coexists

Someone is violently coexisting to enable that lifestyle, though. I don't generally blame the recipients of welfare programs for taking the money, but the state took it from someone else in a non-peaceful manner. Absent that, the lifestyle wouldn't be feasible and we don't have to worry about people aspiring to it.