pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 14 Apr \ parent \ on: Ethical Collapse in the Peer Review of a Leading Vaccine Journal science
Do you think that the journals would do this? I am certain they will always pursue proper attribution, but not to peer-reviewer annotation, because, I understand, that they are supposed to remain anonymous, even when declaring conflicts of interest.
If they didn’t the peer-review process would become much more political than it is already.