reply on: The case FOR CCs \ stacker news ~meta

pull down to refresh

121 sats \ 9 replies \ @optimism OP 16 Apr \ parent \ on: The case FOR CCs meta

I'm sure there are net earners with the 50k being donated to rewards every day, AMA OPs or extremely high quality posters. But to be honest, I've never seen SN as a post-to-earn platform, but more of a pay-to-<post/upvote> thing.

The occasional LLM generated post/comment aside, the space is extremely clean here. That's awesome. Worth many sats and so is the content.

I'm probably a boomer.

138 sats \ 8 replies \ @k00b 16 Apr

We're all boomers probably. Or moomers as @Car calls them - millennials that act like boomers.

110 sats \ 6 replies \ @Car 17 Apr

Yes, post Bitcoin ETF everything changed. Bitcoiners are now divided into different camps, not entirely sure what camp I am in but I am not for ETFs, Bonds, Stablecoins, 💩coins, and people holding my Bitcoin.

1sat =1sat, 1cc =1cc.

On SN if you don’t like it hook up a wallet, take responsibility your a self sovereign Bitcoiner.

164 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 17 Apr

1sat=1cc

29 sats \ 1 reply \ @deSign_r 17 Apr

1cc=0.7sat

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 17 Apr

yup. Somewhere around there, yeah

14 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 17 Apr

1sat =0.7cc

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Car 17 Apr

not if you get 1cc

121 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 17 Apr

1sat =1sat, 1cc =1cc.

Exactly that. Very few people understand this logic, that cc are only for SN.
And not spending sats but ccs is in in fact stacking sats.

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 17 Apr

LOL, I'm stealing that phrasing. Thanks, Car!