pull down to refresh

138 sats \ 8 replies \ @k00b 16 Apr \ parent \ on: The case FOR CCs meta
We're all boomers probably. Or moomers as @Car calls them - millennials that act like boomers.
write
preview
110 sats \ 6 replies \ @Car 17 Apr
Yes, post Bitcoin ETF everything changed. Bitcoiners are now divided into different camps, not entirely sure what camp I am in but I am not for ETFs, Bonds, Stablecoins, 💩coins, and people holding my Bitcoin.
1sat =1sat, 1cc =1cc.
On SN if you don’t like it hook up a wallet, take responsibility your a self sovereign Bitcoiner.
reply
164 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 17 Apr
1sat=1cc
reply
29 sats \ 1 reply \ @Design_r 17 Apr
1cc=0.7sat
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 17 Apr
yup. Somewhere around there, yeah
reply
14 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 17 Apr
1sat =0.7cc
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Car 17 Apr
not if you get 1cc
reply
121 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 17 Apr
1sat =1sat, 1cc =1cc.
Exactly that. Very few people understand this logic, that cc are only for SN. And not spending sats but ccs is in in fact stacking sats.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 17 Apr
LOL, I'm stealing that phrasing. Thanks, Car!
reply