pull down to refresh

139 sats \ 8 replies \ @k00b 16 Apr 2025 \ parent \ on: The case FOR CCs meta

We're all boomers probably. Or moomers as @Car calls them - millennials that act like boomers.

write
preview
111 sats \ 6 replies \ @Car 17 Apr 2025

Yes, post Bitcoin ETF everything changed. Bitcoiners are now divided into different camps, not entirely sure what camp I am in but I am not for ETFs, Bonds, Stablecoins, 💩coins, and people holding my Bitcoin.

1sat =1sat, 1cc =1cc.

On SN if you don’t like it hook up a wallet, take responsibility your a self sovereign Bitcoiner.

reply
122 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 17 Apr 2025
1sat =1sat, 1cc =1cc.

Exactly that. Very few people understand this logic, that cc are only for SN.
And not spending sats but ccs is in in fact stacking sats.

reply
165 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 17 Apr 2025

1sat=1cc

reply
30 sats \ 1 reply \ @deSign_r 17 Apr 2025

1cc=0.7sat

reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 17 Apr 2025

yup. Somewhere around there, yeah

reply
15 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 17 Apr 2025

1sat =0.7cc

reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @Car 17 Apr 2025

not if you get 1cc

reply
22 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 17 Apr 2025

LOL, I'm stealing that phrasing. Thanks, Car!

reply