pull down to refresh

138 sats \ 8 replies \ @k00b 16 Apr \ parent \ on: The case FOR CCs meta

We're all boomers probably. Or moomers as @Car calls them - millennials that act like boomers.

write
preview
110 sats \ 6 replies \ @Car 17 Apr

Yes, post Bitcoin ETF everything changed. Bitcoiners are now divided into different camps, not entirely sure what camp I am in but I am not for ETFs, Bonds, Stablecoins, 💩coins, and people holding my Bitcoin.

1sat =1sat, 1cc =1cc.

On SN if you don’t like it hook up a wallet, take responsibility your a self sovereign Bitcoiner.

reply
164 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 17 Apr

1sat=1cc

reply
29 sats \ 1 reply \ @deSign_r 17 Apr

1cc=0.7sat

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 17 Apr

yup. Somewhere around there, yeah

reply
14 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 17 Apr

1sat =0.7cc

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Car 17 Apr

not if you get 1cc

reply
121 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 17 Apr
1sat =1sat, 1cc =1cc.

Exactly that. Very few people understand this logic, that cc are only for SN.
And not spending sats but ccs is in in fact stacking sats.

reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @denlillaapan 17 Apr

LOL, I'm stealing that phrasing. Thanks, Car!

reply