pull down to refresh

28 sats \ 14 replies \ @grayruby 19 Apr \ parent \ on: Most comments wins 👀 meta

We will get there by next week.

write
preview
165 sats \ 13 replies \ @ek OP 19 Apr

I honestly didn't wager on 1.5M because 1.4M items was already what I determined to be "interesting."

Maybe I will find the comment where I came up with this number and told @mega_dreamer about it.

reply
20 sats \ 11 replies \ @mega_dreamer 20 Apr

I think the 1.5M was created by mistake.

If you guys want we can NA/Cancel the 1.5M markets and refund the traders.

reply
1120 sats \ 7 replies \ @Coinsreporter 20 Apr
I think the 1.5M was created by mistake.

Please Let it be there. I've some yes share on it.

reply
20 sats \ 5 replies \ @Undisciplined 20 Apr

Did you take yes on both?

reply
20 sats \ 4 replies \ @Coinsreporter 20 Apr

No, I have yes on 1.5M only.

reply
30 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined 20 Apr

Are you doing the same thing I'm doing?

Yes on 1.5
No on 1.4

reply
30 sats \ 2 replies \ @Coinsreporter 20 Apr

reply
30 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 20 Apr

20% chance of landing exactly between 1.4 and 1.5 is ridiculous.

view all 1 replies
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @mega_dreamer 20 Apr

ok.

reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 20 Apr

I don't think we need to do that.

reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @mega_dreamer 20 Apr

ok.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 20 Apr

Noooooooo!!!!!

It's part of my elaborate hedging strategy.

reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 19 Apr

I am sure there was some logic to it.

reply