pull down to refresh

20 sats \ 27 replies \ @Aardvark 20 Apr \ parent \ on: Most comments wins 👀 meta
Fuck no, @ek said we couldn't make bots, there's no rule about already being a bot.
write
preview
40 sats \ 12 replies \ @Undisciplined 20 Apr
Hmm, that would mean any preexisting bot could participate, right?
Or does it just rule out stackers like @supercyclone, who were made by other stackers?
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @Aardvark 20 Apr
I'm not exactly sure to be honest. I say just do it, and find out if you get disqualified or not.
reply
0 sats \ 10 replies \ @grayruby 20 Apr
I do have the lightning wallet that controls his login on my phone.
reply
20 sats \ 9 replies \ @Undisciplined 20 Apr
I believe we've established that he's inherently disqualified, although I'm not sure I followed all of the metaphysics that went into that conclusion.
reply
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @Aardvark 23h
You're the smart one, just tell me what I'm supposed to believe
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 23h
No one should have that much power
reply
0 sats \ 6 replies \ @grayruby 23h
Who is disqualified?
reply
20 sats \ 5 replies \ @Undisciplined 23h
The meat bot you made
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @grayruby 23h
He isn’t participating anyways.
view all 4 replies
42 sats \ 13 replies \ @grayruby 20 Apr
Looks like you found a loophole.
reply
40 sats \ 11 replies \ @Aardvark 20 Apr
We're all loopholes.
reply
42 sats \ 10 replies \ @grayruby 20 Apr
Like turtles it is loopholes all the way down.
reply
40 sats \ 9 replies \ @Aardvark 20 Apr
I actually like that theory.
reply
42 sats \ 8 replies \ @grayruby 20 Apr
reply
20 sats \ 7 replies \ @Aardvark 20 Apr
I'm the bottom turtle.
view all 7 replies
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @realBitcoinDog 17h
I’m so sad I can’t find the thread of this comment. Did I find a loophole? Talking to me?
reply