pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @DarthCoin 25 Apr \ parent \ on: Ever Heard of a Bitcoiner Without Bitcoin? bitcoin
It's common for early bitcoiners
No. Those weren't bitcoiners... were losers. This is the correct word: LOSERS. I joined Bitcoin in 2012 and never ever lost a sat or sell it for more fiat. Yes I spent a lot of BTC, because bitcoin is money.
write
preview
105 sats \ 4 replies \ @OT OP 25 Apr
lol
We all know that you're "special".
This guy IS a bitcoiner and he will eventually get is sats in his own time. He just might end up with less because of it. I just don't think he'll be particularly hurt by this. Maybe it's an opportunity cost, maybe more wealth but he'll definitely be able to provide some value in the new world.
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @DarthCoin 25 Apr
Explain how is a bitcoiner that after so many years end up with none, even that he had some in the early years? FFS are 16 years ! not 16 days... even if you keep 1000 sats per year and is still something. Is more than ZERO.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @OT OP 25 Apr
I'm not calling him a bitcoiner because he spent sats in 2011. I'm just saying that he is an obvious bitcoiner because he lives off grid, hates banks and gives away valuable info for free.
Why focus on a mistake made 12 years ago? It's well gone
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 25 Apr
Did you read my initial response post? It is NOT enough to live offgrid and hate banks and govs, if you do not finish the whole sovereign journey, by putting the last piece in the puzzle: Bitcoin. Simply can't, it's impossible.
You cannot hate banks and gov and you still use their paper fiat money... you are still in their game. And using gold nuggets or barter with eggs and goats doesn't work well.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT OP 25 Apr
Ok, I think I understand that you're saying that unless you use bitcoin the sovereignty is incomplete.
Maybe so, but they are most of the way there. Can we agree on 80% of the way there if they are using cash and barter?
reply