pull down to refresh

Absolutely, protect purity47.8%
No, innovation matters17.4%
He's stuck in 201321.7%
Depends on data's dankness13.0%
23 votes \ poll ended

No, he's right that spam is bad but he's wrong that we can do better than OP_RETURN as least evil sane thing.

reply
101 sats \ 1 reply \ @mtk4000 29 Apr

I'm confident that spam will be priced out by economic transactions in the long run. But I still appreciate having purists around to stir up debate, because I'm not a fan of all the garbage on my node.

reply

Which is why the Luke is a troll attitude that I've seen stated somewhere recently bothers me, quite a bit. Even if it would be the case that he trolls sometimes - which I doubt is the intent fwiw - there's immense value in having someone question your ideas and solutions. A contrary view that is alien to whatever echo chamber one finds themselves in is an opportunity to improve. We test code adversely so we should test ideas and concepts too; especially when things are being addressed that arguably had unforeseen consequences in previous instances of the same kind of change: like dropping script size limits.

reply

Spam money isn't infinite

At some point their sats will be drained

reply

I can't predict but for real but ithink spam will be priced

reply