pull down to refresh
5 sats \ 2 replies \ @028559d218 13h \ parent \ on: Bitcoin has a Brand Problem bitcoin
Even if we had 'bigger blocks' would people use them?
Would 'cheaper transactions' incentive 'more transacting'?
No, I don't think it's the price to transact that is the issue.
I think it's more about the EASE to transact.
Using Bitcoin on the base chain was a new skill that millions of people have learned to do. It works offline, just send to the recipient's address.
Lightning is 1000x harder to use. You have to be online. You have to open/close channels. You have to consider inbound and outbound liquidity. Then, you have to figure out how to connect your phone to your node so you can spend anywhere you go. Sure, LN works great when I'm at home using my node. But using it self-custodially, away from my house only works half the time. Sure, it's improved A LOT since 2020, but it's still unusable.
I have set up a few local merchants on their own, self custodial LN nodes. I have ended up being the manager and maintainer of them. I realized that it's way too difficult for the average store owner. It's not going to work in a self-custodial way.
From now on, I've just been recommending new merchants use a custodial solution like CashApp to take LN payments. It's just 1000x easier. Exactly what the Creature-from-Jekyll-Island wants us to do. And, apparently, exactly what Bitcoiners like @justin_shocknet want. Pushing people to custodial solutions, even though Fedimint is a great middle ground that improves on custodial LN, even though it's not perfect.
Layer 2's and 3's need to be as easy to use as the base layer. Otherwise, I believe, they will never work. Visa/Venmo/Fiat will continue to dominate. Especially sense Bitcoiners themselves seem too lazy to fight back very hard against fiat. It's just too convenient, I guess.
reply
Lightning is not easy for Merchants. And frankly... I think they should be using custodial solutions to start, unless they are really really committed.
As far as self custody and Lightning goes...
I was able to use Lightning across continents from my own node (LND) and I am not a heavy command-line user. Granted there wasn't anyone else paying in Bitcoin in Lugano (not many people) but at least it worked.
I have set up a self-contained 'zeus' node on a phone too and it's as easy as... zapping the Lightning channel the LSP is setting up for you.
Then you have a channel you've 'rented' and you can send sats to it. Few if any on-chain fees and you can swap out into cold storage whenever you want. What's the issue with this?
In my opinion it's not a technical challenge, but an educational one. Just my opinion.
reply