pull down to refresh

361 sats \ 2 replies \ @Murch 2 May \ on: My High-Level Synopsis of the Recent OP_RETURN Debates bitcoin
Furthermore, while Core may not be 'endorsing spam' in the way of jpegs, they do seem to be fairly open and vocal about validating Citrea's harships (#968877).
I just wanted to address a point that I have been seeing a lot. People seem to think that @petertodd is a big-time Bitcoin Core contributor and that he is speaking for Bitcoin Core. Nobody is speaking for Bitcoin Core, everyone is speaking for themselves. And while Peter is certainly engaged in a lot of discussions around Bitcoin, he’s not regularly contributing to Bitcoin Core; he last contributed code to Bitcoin Core in 2016.
write
preview
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @unschooled OP 2 May
Yes, this was an unfair metonymy and was not intended to be a jab at other core devs. Nevertheless, I am critical of Todd, whose voice, evidently, has much import in the space. Thanks for making that point of clarification.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @sudonaka 3 May
reply