There really is no reason not to remove the OP_RETURN limit. The pandoras box of indistinguishably can never be closed, and the attitude of destruction will never preclude grinding, even at great economic loss. it becomes one of harm minimization. Your adversary will always have a finite resources, we have to play a longer game.
The strategy that increases protocol longevity (by minimizing active resource cost like [cpu+mem]) is the optimum strategy.
How about remain the same?
There really is no reason not to remove the OP_RETURN limit.
The pandoras box of indistinguishably can never be closed, and the attitude of destruction will never preclude grinding, even at great economic loss. it becomes one of harm minimization. Your adversary will always have a finite resources, we have to play a longer game.
The strategy that increases protocol longevity (by minimizing active resource cost like [cpu+mem]) is the optimum strategy.
Bitcoin Core node count share will decrease as Knots increases to 21%
No idea what the OP_RETURN debate is even about (didn't even know there was a debate going on until I saw this poll).
Just the way it is now.
How about someone explain to me a) the relevance/practicality of the debate, and b) what the conflict is really about.
here I made an explanation in few memes #974547