pull down to refresh

reply
15 sats \ 0 replies \ @gandules 7h
How about focusing on CTV softforks this seems more important.
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @nullcount 5h
There is no change to Bitcoin required to implement this. Whether someone implements this does not "improve" bitcoin.
Use whatever unit YOU want in YOUR application. No consensus is required. This is best solved as a client-side user preference setting. Not a BIP-worthy proposal, IMO
reply
Bip-177 ? what is it ?
reply
62 sats \ 1 reply \ @Murch 6h
John Carvalho’s proposal to refer to sats as bitcoins:
reply
cheers
reply
5 sats \ 0 replies \ @senf 6h
Renaming sats to bitcoin, no longer referring to 100 million sats as 1 bitcoin.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @rblb 3h
this is an attack on bitcoin
reply
it's worth looking at the specification details of the BIP
i think it would make a lot of sense to evade the unit bias. people have all kinds of names for Federal Reserve Notes:
  • bucks
  • dollars
  • greenbacks
  • garbage
nothing prevents us from still talking about sats... like pennies, cents, etc. the language is ours to use as we see fit.
oh, and "bits" is fucking regarded.
reply
if a gazillion people show up tomorrow and decide to call satoshis arthur, there's sod all anyone can do to stop them - silly, pointless BIP trolling is an irrelevance - anecdotally, it smacks of the same kind of presumption that's been causing so much trouble lately.
reply