pull down to refresh
0 new comment
117 sats \ 3 replies \ @Coinsreporter 24 May
Another bad news for ETH.
reply
0 new comment
189 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby OP 24 May
95% of their business was Bitcoin related. They will probably save money streamlining things. Might be purely an economic decision but regardless it is a positive move.
reply
0 new comment
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @realBitcoinDog 24 May
💯
reply
0 new comment
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @88b0c423eb 25 May
what's ETH?
reply
0 new comment
35 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 24 May
Stablecoins will still run on sh$tcoins though right?
reply
0 new comment
35 sats \ 0 replies \ @Mishawaka 24 May
Excellent. I don't do business with companies that deal with shipcoins
reply
0 new comment
40 sats \ 3 replies \ @hasherstacker 25 May
The question isn't "why discontinuing with ETH?",
but rather, "Why did they brought ETH?"
reply
0 new comment
20 sats \ 1 reply \ @standard_sats 25 May
I belive they were "helping" somebody during 3AC - FTX saga. But I may be wrong.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby OP 25 May
They bought a crypto fund at one point. That’s when they started adding support for ETH.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby OP 25 May
Good point.
reply
0 new comment
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @fiatbad 25 May
Well, that opens them up for business from my perspective. Now, I'll at least give them a chance.
I refuse to do business with companies that validate alt-coins in any way, whatsoever.
I'm lookin' at you, Casa. (fucking cowards)
reply
0 new comment
40 sats \ 2 replies \ @BlokchainB 24 May
What’s better? Paying off a debt or buying bitcoin getting a loan pay of the debt then use future cash flows to pay off the loan to unlock your BTC?
reply
0 new comment
143 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby OP 24 May
I would prefer the latter but I guess that would depend on your situation and if you can stomach having your bitcoin as collateral.
reply
0 new comment
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 25 May
Leverage!
reply
0 new comment
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @Riberet 25 May
Bad news for Ethereum, Ledn should focus only on Bitcoin, no shitcoins.
reply
0 new comment
40 sats \ 2 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 25 May
Any idea if this company is available in the US?
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby OP 25 May
I think so.,
reply
0 new comment
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @Jon_Hodl 25 May
They are but not in my state. Sad face.
reply
0 new comment
40 sats \ 3 replies \ @LibertasBR 2 Jun
Should Bitcoiners give second chances to companies that shill shitcoins? I'm new and don't know the history of each one, so I do my research — and if I see a company was involved in promoting shitcoins, I stay away.
reply
0 new comment
34 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby OP 2 Jun
I think that is fair but I also appreciate a company recognizing their error. You have to remember these companies can be under immense pressure from their investors at times to expand to other cryptos that those investors may hold or have other ties to. For a young company it can be hard to say no to the people funding you. I think that is why it is so important for Bitcoin centric companies to seek out investment from Bitcoin centric investors rather than just taking money from anyone that will give it to you.
reply
0 new comment
40 sats \ 1 reply \ @LibertasBR 2 Jun
The problem isn’t the company itself, but the people who make it up. Without a change in leadership and policies, I don’t believe simply shifting direction is enough to redeem it. The issue is finding reliable information about those changes. I might come across as seeing things in a good vs. bad dichotomy, or as if I believe no one deserves redemption — that’s not what I mean to say. What I’m trying to express is that companies with a track record of promoting Bitcoin, who then pivot to promoting shitcoins, know exactly what they’re doing. When they try to go back, it doesn’t seem sincere enough to me.
reply
0 new comment
19 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby OP 2 Jun
I get it. They didn't go full shitcoiners. They added eth. Which never made sense to me. Either be bitcoin only or be full on shitcoiners. The fact that they took half measures makes me feel like they were pressured by investors to add eth but who knows.
reply
0 new comment
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @BlokchainB 24 May
Also they have much better minimums than strike
reply
0 new comment
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @realBitcoinDog 24 May
But will you use it?
reply
0 new comment
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @kurszusz 26 May
LEDN made the best decision!
reply
0 new comment