I'll write up my thoughts about this stuff, at some point, but I think that's just a flat out wrong way to think about it.

From a value standpoint, they won the games he played well in and they lost the other ones. It's not about who played the best, although I still think that was Hali, it's about whose play mattered the most.

I also thought Haliburton should have been ECF MVP. I heard somewhere, I forgot where, that the vote was 5-4 split between Siakam and Haliburton. Haliburton had a couple bad games, and that inconsistency was probably what cost him the ECF MVP.