pull down to refresh

210 sats \ 8 replies \ @k00b OP 3 Jun \ parent \ on: Bitcoin Core development and transaction relay policy bitcoin
Do you have a fix that you like for those bugs mentioned? There’s been lots of discussion about this elsewhere, and afaik no one has proposed a way to detect data stuffing except for specific historical methods, which when fixed would be worked around with new data stuffing methods.
write
preview
0 sats \ 7 replies \ @LibreHans 4 Jun
Core devs are clearly saying they don't want a fix.
reply
127 sats \ 6 replies \ @k00b OP 4 Jun
Core devs don’t think there’s a fix. That’s why I asked you for yours. Maybe we just need to show them The Fix and they’ll see their mistake.
reply
100 sats \ 5 replies \ @LibreHans 4 Jun
Indeed, there is no fix, when core devs fuck up at the consensus level, there are only consensus level fixes, which they refuse to touch. If they refuse to take responsibility for their errors, they should never touch the consensus layer again. Like I said in my first comment.
reply
50 sats \ 4 replies \ @k00b OP 4 Jun
What’s the consensus fix you’d like to see?
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @LibreHans 4 Jun
Consensus fix?
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Norbert 7 Jun
You said "there are only consensus level fixes". Are there any particular consensus-level fix that you would like to see?
view all 2 replies