pull down to refresh

Auto-revenue splits? Cross-posting? What? What?
89 sats \ 3 replies \ @ek 4 Jun
Better wallets by me in this PR.
With my changes, we will actually show wallets, and not a mix of wallets and protocols. That should make it a lot less confusing for stackers because they can just search for a wallet they have, instead of having to know what protocols the wallets they have support.
@k00b is working on better payments here.
What might be interesting in there for you:
  • you can now pay partially in CCs and sats
  • real-time territory revenue
Once we combine @k00b's changes with my changes, we can also implement non-custodial forwards a lot easier since currently, they are always CCs.
And most likely also auto-revenue splits since it's essentially a forwarded payment, but I guess we need to support territory co-founders first.
reply
real-time territory revenue
Meaning revenue with each post/comment/zap in our territory? That's pretty cool.
How many CC's are floating around SN at any given time?
reply
62 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 4 Jun
Meaning revenue with each post/comment/zap in our territory? That's pretty cool.
Yes!
How many CC's are floating around SN at any given time?
We want to include this in the analytics
reply
109 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 4 Jun
Basically, the changes I’m making, when I can find enough time around code review and finding good links, produce a single unified ledger for SN (when we were custodial the entire db was effectively a ledger … because money would come/go to custodial wallets … now there are 3 kinds of sources of funds potentially and 3 kinds of sinks, CCs, rewards sats, wallets … and wallets are crazy because they settle at a nondeterministic time, sometimes hours after we first record them).
Anyway, this ledger will allow analytics/satistics to be ideal in terms of detail like “how many CCs there are” or “how many CCs are spent on what in which territory.” It will also allow, given its flexibility, more complicated financial relationships between actions/stackers.
We sort of swapped out the foundation of SN with a kind of hodgepodge of stuff when we made the custodial switch - it works but it doesn’t allow the building to keep getting taller without a new, proper foundation.
reply