pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kristapsk OP 12 Feb \ parent \ on: UTXOracle is back bitcoin
Probably. I was once in a such event.
It was broken, mainly due to various non-financial transactions like Ordinals. New version of the script works again.
Yes, of course!
But Uruguay was even smaller by population when they won the first FIFA World Cup in 1930.
Comparision:
- Uruguay, 1930: ~1,875,000;
- Latvia, 1935: ~1,953,000.
But, anyway, more important is that this is great sports film. It's anyway just "based on true story".
I like "Dream Team 1935", how Latvia unexpectedly become the first European champions in basketball in 1935. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2516280/
A fully autonomous AI agent is programmed to go on to the internet and create cryptocurrency wallets, then create crypto currencies, then endlessly create millions of similar versions of itself that want to trade that crypto.Now let's assume all these AIs are programmed to try to indefinitely increase the value of their crypto, something they accomplish in similar ways humans do—by promotion and then trading their cryptos for higher values. Additionally, the autonomous AIs open their crypto to be traded with humans, creating a functioning market on the blockchain for all.
Don't trade shitcoins = problem solved!
It's not about KYC when buying, it's amount at which centralized exchanges must ask you to which wallet are you sending bitcoins, is it your wallet, etc. And AFAIK I can accept also same way for goods and services on a company, just write invoice / receipt, like with cash (which is kinda KYC anyway). But I might be wrong here in details. In any case, "travel rule" kinda does not affect payments between two non-custodial wallets and likely does not affect non financial institutions or institutions under MiCA. Then again, limits on accepting cash for legal entities in Latvia is few times bigger. When somebody finally will want to pay in bitcoins to my company, then we'll see. Some time ago one guy did presentation about buying real estate with BTC here, AFAIR buyer just needs to prove source of funds, that he had legally earned X amount, not something about specific UTXO from which you send coins.
needs to be BTC bought in reputable sources like Coinbase and Binance
That's stupid! Amount is small and they have your delivery details anyway. Some USA law requirement for them? It does not even reach new EU "travel rule" limits. I don't think I'm required to do any additional KYC to accept payments for goods and services in EU under 1000 EUR as a legal entity.