111 sats \ 0 replies \ @larestrepo 10 Aug 2023 \ on: A call to toxicity bitcoin
There's nothing that opposes your view on bitcoin if you just simply compare it with scam and ponzi projects, in that case you will definitely fall into this echo chamber and you will miss some interesting technology improvements made in the ecosystem which not necessarily go against bitcoin principles. So it does not mean that human technology improvements in the crypto industry must stopped because bitcoin is there and everything else is just simply falling under the same bag called scam. In fact, I am not ashamed of being part of the "crypto" crowd where I've got from lot of interesting knowledge as well.
"I believe the real attack on bitcoin is shitcoinery, it's not coming from the state or the CBDC's!"
Another misconception from my perspective is thinking that there's some kind of attack against bitcoin from crypto projects. And yes CBDCs are your enemy.
Anything is a pollutant, even water is in excessive amounts. The reason CO2 is considered pollutant is because is shifting some kind of equilibrium that is beneficial to us.
You are fundamentally wrong in all your comparisos. First of all you are comparing a layer 2 like lightning with layer 1 like Cardano. In terms of fees is equivalent of comparing Bitcoin with lightning itself. There are layer 2 solutions in Cardano FYI and a comparison between these 2 would make more sense.
Second, your user experience is narrowed to a wallet, exodus, which by the way is very closed to a centralized exchange. So in this case is like comparing your user experience with something like binance and the lightning experience. In fact in exodus you cannot stake your ada to any pool different than the ones from exodus which means you don't really own those Ada's in exodus. Invite codes for better trading fees? Really? Do you really think is this coming from Cardano? Again is like thinking that a trading fee in binance is something coming from Bitcoin protocol.
GENESIS