pull down to refresh
@mo
stacking since: #147412longest cowboy streak: 77
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @mo 29 Jun \ parent \ on: Stacker Saloon
wrong answer.
Anyone can do it at once, individually, now.
Surety
Something that has a security number is a security.
Security means surety, which means "one (as an accommodation party) who promises to answer for the debt or default of another." Security/surely is a debt instrument.
The 'social' security number is for security. What is the security? The person/entity/citizen JOHN JONES. If John of the Jones acts as agent for JOHN JONES then John now promises to answer for the debt or default of another.
Don't be the surety. Don't use the security. Don't offer its number. Get the f away from it. It's their security. Their person. Their franchise. Don't be the master/mister/captain of their U.S. Citizen Ship.
Separation of money from state--financial institutions--this was the goal in the whitepaper, highlighted in its first sentence:
I struggle to comprehend why so many forget about it, maybe they all ignore that gov't and states are financial institutions too? Better said, registered corporations doing business as usual... guess what's the capital. Yes, human capital, and if thou still having a passport #1012668, probably still a cattle/slave too!
This is hard and patient work in educating who believe to be the authority... authority of what?
Learn the difference between driving and travelling, as free man and women we are free to travel anywhere we wish.
Educate yourself, educate your community. We don't need licenses, nor we need liberties we never asked for. We simply need to be aware of the freedom we have since birth. Learn to claim it back, because someone give it away for you long time ago #505860
From the title: No one ask US corp to protect Georgian people...
This is easily a closed tab after just reading "I know my government" in the second line.
What the hell libertarians have in their minds? For how long they will continue begging for liberties to "their" employing govs instead focusing on freedom that we all already have?
the FBI sure hates that one simple trick
the FBI inc. hate like it because is another way to make another commercial offer (going to jail) when one isn't ready to decline, or does not know how. Use words properly and you'll be fine.
and disappear like Satoshi did?
yes, because ego is a trap. Do you see any downside on Satoshi disappearance?
Before becoming a bitcoin dev then, (a) thou could have learned the rules of the game and how the system works. This way, you might have avoided the trap you're in. Sure, it’s a comfy trap, you can stay there. Or (b) keep your personal information private to avoid feeling pressured by these commercial offers.
Bitcoin devs today are a bunch of losers, sold to corporations for few bitcoin and convinced to make best interests of "others"... Where are the cypherpunks?
Do you remember the "separation of money from state" thing? FTFS is in the first line of the whitepaper:
Governments are financial institutions. Thou are NOT worth the bitcoin received. If not thou, someone else will take care, no worries. No need to feel so important or responsible for humanity, because you’re not. Or are thou going for president next? In the name of Bitcoin?
going to prison for developing software
wrong, they will go to prison because they continue to believe they are a legal person... a citizen.
This rise on me a question: should bitcoin maintainers be and stay anonymous, like Satoshi was? full on cypherpunks? what would be the implications?
Good luck begging politician! Such waste of time and energy... #996774
@TheBlueMatt or @bluematt should learn a bit more of commercial law instead of wasting his time with such campaigns #991724
Once in the fiat trap, the hard part is about un-learning firs. Then learning up again with a strong basis on different values (aligned with bitcoin ethos) and a clear overview on how the game need to be played, as sovereign individual, not as citizen slave. I'm writing an article about this I'll be sharing soon.