I was thinking the same thing. I mean are people not even using LUKS encryption?

If it is not a yachting related accident I'm very sorry for his loss.

Qubes OS is highly recommended for securely handling USB drives due to its robust isolation capabilities. It segregates applications into separate virtual machines, ensuring that malware from a USB cannot compromise your entire system. This isolation helps maintain security without sacrificing usability, making it a top choice for those concerned with digital security.

Alternatively, using a bootable OS like Tails or a live Linux distribution provides a temporary, secure environment for safely checking and transferring files from a USB drive. These systems don't affect your main operating system, as they run independently from a USB or CD and automatically erase traces of their use upon shutdown.

There are organisations like that, in Sweden and Europe. Both the "Pease" and environmentalist organizations has been financed and nudged by Russian operators in their subvesive attacks on Europe.

Look for example at how they managed to screw up Germany by having the nuclear power generation dismantled to make them dependent on Russian natural gas. Or the Swedish peace movement that wants peace only by western Europe making concessions to Russia. They never have a bad word to say about Russia pouring artillery over European hospitals and multi family housing.

Didn't click the link, but based on your question the answer must be 'no, that's a stupid question. Ukraine gave their nukes to Russia when the Soviet regime fell, trusting a promise they would protect Ukraine. But they invaded them instead.'

I think it would at least equate a buyer going in to purchase 60 000 bitcoins to begin with.

This would further the positive Bitcoin evaluation even more. As the bitcoin price winds up, the MSTR price go up even more. The stock will climb up on the list and get an even bigger weighing of the index, further accelerating everything since the index allocation rate rise with an increased Bitcoin price. Bigger companies will need to buy Bitcoin to defend their S&P 500 position.

The taxman would probably just look in the other end. They probably don't care in what way you were paying.l for the goods. Meaning if they suspect you for something, maybe they look at the flow of goods to your house for a period and make an interpolation over the year. Then you'll have to prove your innocence (tax law works this way at least in my country).

Or if they suspect many bitcoiners buy with untaxed funds from a specific store they go to the company and look at their shipping destinations.

And what they say is true. For example, 2 minutes after I knew the adress I knew his name, his wife, what companies he's active in and what profit his private companies filed the last couple of years. Absolutely awful.

I live a couple of minutes walk from the house where they got robbed. We're not even allowed to build gated communities here.

It is a relatively good area, but crime is getting more and more rampant and spread outside of the bad areas. I don't even recognize the country from how it looked 15 or so years ago. I feel trapped and in constant risk of being doxxed here.

Deciding to leave involves more than your own life, like your family, friends and everything you worked for.

I agree, and have always tried to keep a local Clone of my most favored repositories.

A couple of years ago I tried git-ssb.

GIT in ipfs has too many limitations.

A quick search came up with https://radicle.xyz/ but I have no experience of it even though it sounds interesting. I do feel some tingeling shitcoin vibes, but I didn't see anything at the first glance.

If you don't have a subscription the article is available here https://archive.ph/FQNAg

This 🤡 would is just comical. With similar way of thinking, their employees shouldn't be allowed to own pension funds or use banks since they're regulating those as well

Imagine your style of typing on a keyboard, where each keypress has its own unique timing - this can be akin to your typing "fingerprint". For instance, you might press the letter "d" slightly faster than the letter "q" on a QWERTY keyboard, possibly because "d" is typed with a stronger finger and is centrally located.

These subtle timing differences between keystrokes can potentially be "fingerprinted" by attackers who analyze the rhythm of your typing.

Now, let’s visualize the new OpenSSH feature as a bus system: every keypress must wait at a bus stop, and a bus (data packet) arrives at a regular interval to pick them up.

Even if "d" leaves its home earlier than "q", they might arrive at the destination (the OpenSSH server) at the same time because they took the same bus. This metaphorical bus system obscures the original typing rhythm since an observer (the attacker) can only see when each letter gets on the bus (leaves your computer) and when it gets off the bus (arrives at the server), not the exact time it left its home (when the key was pressed).

Additionally, after you’ve finished typing, extra, random letters also ride the bus, making it look like you typed more letters than you actually did. This can further complicate an attacker's attempt to figure out how many keys you pressed, and when, enhancing the security of your typing data.