0 sats \ 1 reply \ @tomlaies 30 Oct \ parent \ on: Do People Actually Believe the Election Result will Result in Positive Change based
There is not going to be a civil war.
Terminally online people need to understand that the overwhelming majority of people on both sides don't care as much
He views Bitcoin and "Endorsing" mainstream US candidates as fundamentally incompatible.
And because Bitcoiners can't just say things and speak in tongues instead he gave you this smug dismissive answer
Would yo be willing to go a little more into specifics? "Too much hardship" or "too much complexity" seems a little too abstract, non-specific, vague etc to me.
That's on purpose. Answer with what your personal understanding of your lifes problems are. Do you consider them hard thing to do or would you consider them as things that could be easy
As you have already noted and it's also slightly addressed in the thread: There are lots of thing that could be considered hard or complex depending on your point of view.
Let me give you one example of things I suspect things that could be view differently:
- A guy named Ivan Incel from Iowa has trouble finding a life partner. He's nearing his 30s and is afraid to die alone. Bad situation. Is that hardship or complexity issue? I'm sure he personally blames it on something but that doesn't matter for the complex/hard question: Is finding a girlfriend just a hard thing to do? Or is the dating world needlessly complex to navigate? Let me repeat that the reason doesn't really matter he can view any reason as hardship and personal/societal suffering or as an annoying complex thing.
Isn't it possible to close a channel in such a way that one of the two sides gets less than 546 sats?
Hello everyone, I would also like to receive Bitcoin for no reason and nothing in return.
Send it right my way: tomlaies@stacker.news
Thanks!
"We find that the decline in robot prices increased both the number of robots and employment by raising the productivity and production scale of robot-adopting industries."
I re-checked https://wtfhappenedin1971.com/ and it doesn't look like they actually produced most of their own charts. They were mostly taken from other websites... so either everyone was being incompetent or had an agenda,
It's called cherry picking. You could pick 1970 or 1969 or 1985 instead and find lots of graphs just as well.
or at least there was some kind of divergence in the early 1970s depending on what data you're measuring.
Yes. Exactly. "early 1970s". Not exactly flipping a switch in one year and in one year only.
I'm just saying that I don't really understand what the twitter thread is trying to claim.
Maybe you missunderstood that the claim is a bigger argument than it is. The argument is only that nothing happened in 1971 specifically.
It's long term trends that span many years and multiple decades. Time moves. Time moves every year. Not just in 1971. Time moved in 1972 as well. And in 1973 too.
Which didn't happen in 1971. That happened in the whole time period. At least 2 decades. At least.
The difference between "it happened in 1971" vs "it's a continuous trend over several decades" isn't a small difference. That's the difference between an orchestrated event and an organic trend.
The market inefficiency on all these new plattforms is insane
No, I'm not making a bet based on my opinion on the election. I make bets on arbitraging the differences between plattforms. The only reason I only do small 4 digit bets is because these plattforms are new and untested.
It's insane. You'd think Bitcoiners would be smarter on economics. But they aren't, they can't comprehend the difference between their own subjective opinion on candidates and objective differences in betting odds.
I reread the post and I'm pretty sure this lightning address withdrawal will work (see here: #723007)
You just need to put in your lightning address here: https://stacker.news/settings/wallets
stop using your SN lightning address on nostr
I thought original post said the username@stacker.news ln-url will continue working as a forwarding method?
We might simply set the threshold to 0 after that date so there will be one last automated withdrawal to empty your custodial wallet.
Big event. K00b should film this with a big red button for the YT podcast.
It doesn't?
That sucks. Just typing in an ln-url or Bolt12 URI would for sure be the easiest thing to set up