reply on: Evidence backing the "Big Blockers are behind Paul Sztorc's Drivechains" theory \ stacker news ~bitcoin

65 sats \ 15 replies \ @nemo 4 Sep 2023 \ on: Evidence backing the "Big Blockers are behind Paul Sztorc's Drivechains" theory bitcoin

deleted by author

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @DiracDelta 4 Sep 2023

I wouldn't and I didn't. Many people were around back then.

10 sats \ 2 replies \ @nemo 4 Sep 2023

deleted by author

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DiracDelta 4 Sep 2023

I will admit though that I did not have a great understanding at the time, but more of a heuristic approach of "yeah, these guys seem to be on the right side of thing and these other guys do not".

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nemo 4 Sep 2023

deleted by author

0 sats \ 10 replies \ @eduardopro OP 4 Sep 2023

No, I wouldn't. Because Bchash wasn't cool. It was stupid. And so are Drivechains.

375 sats \ 2 replies \ @nemo 4 Sep 2023

deleted by author

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @eduardopro OP 4 Sep 2023

You can read The Blocksize War for free here --> https://blog.bitmex.com/?s=blocksize+war&lang=en_us

Cheers!

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nemo 4 Sep 2023

deleted by author

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @ek 4 Sep 2023

So you never said dumb stuff in your life?

21 sats \ 5 replies \ @eduardopro OP 4 Sep 2023

I do, from time to time.

Do you think it's not possible for people to pay you to say dumb stuff?

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 4 Sep 2023

Do you think it's not possible for people to pay you to say dumb stuff?

Good point, I do

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @nemo 4 Sep 2023

deleted by author

125 sats \ 1 reply \ @Ribbit 4 Sep 2023

He goes back and forth depending on who is in the room or tweet thread. He is just trying to keep the bitcoin community together

10 sats \ 0 replies \ @nemo 4 Sep 2023

deleted by author

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @eduardopro OP 4 Sep 2023

Hey, Adam Back is a legend in my book, but I don't respect that he's in bed with the Tether people.

You can disagree with people you admire.