0 sats \ 0 replies \ @SevenOfNine 2 May
Fixed the link for you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honeypot_(computing)
reply
0 sats \ 7 replies \ @_b_o_n_e_s_ 2 May
if joinmarket had pool sizes like whirlpool it would slay
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @kristapsk 2 May
JoinMarket does not have concept of pools and coinjoin rounds.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @_b_o_n_e_s_ 2 May
Yes indeed. I like the design of Whirlpool. And the decentralized nature of Joinmarket. But I don't like the randomness of Joinmarket. With Whirlpool you know what you're going to end up with on the other side of the coinjoin
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @_b_o_n_e_s_ 2 May
the 5x5 whirlpool design was so neat and elegant
reply
31 sats \ 3 replies \ @kruw 2 May
Whirlpool was actually incredible block space inefficient. Creating a bigger coinjoin provides more privacy for all participants in the transaction. Hiding is far more effective when there's a bigger crowd to hide in, like Wasabi's coinjoins: 0b97ef8972a2e488671e202f3e3b8ababc76099751c95610afef8c2f271d98e6
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @_b_o_n_e_s_ 2 May
Or you can participate in more than one coinjoin
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @kruw 2 May
Multiple big coinjoins is still better than multiple small coinjoins, this scaling property does not go away with successive transactions.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @_b_o_n_e_s_ 2 May
you do you boo
reply