15 sats \ 0 replies \ @south_korea_ln 6h \ parent \ on: Ecash + Lightning Network? lightning
Calle comments as follows
Jimmy Song at it again. Not everything should be linked to Bitcoin. This is, at best, an entertaining read. Fiction. You cannot reduce the complexity of marriage to a simple concept of low vs high time-preference. And if he were to look a bit in other current day societies other than the US, his whole premise falls down. Take Korea for instance. Until a few years back, no fault divorce did not exist. Adultery had to be proven to get a divorce. Leading to a majority of miserable relationships in the generation before mine. Maybe, just maybe, no fault divorce would have saved a lot of children from a miserable childhood amongst miserable parents.
I prefer much more his technical material.
Maybe I'm biased as my ideological views often don't align with his. Maybe you'll like it. My rant should motivate you to read the article. Well done Jimmy, well done :) Engagement, achieved.
And this not just Cato Institute propaganda, similar reports from MIT. This looks promising indeed...
I heard about them shutting it down, never heard about this service before though... Probably telling
Yet, the weights of most LLMs fit a desktop computer. Conceptually and fundamentally different things of course, but makes one wonder how much that zettabyte of data would achieve that an LLM can't... If anything at all. How much of that is actually useful data?
I remember watching 3blue1brown's recent videos (or one of the channels he links, not sure) and the consensus still seemed to be 2x your amount of training data will 2x the performance of your model, hence the race to more data and bigger models rather than algorithmic improvments.