pull down to refresh

If the reported news from the NYT is to be believed (iffy at best) this attack wasn’t a true attack in my mind since they made sure the base was empty and launched enough to show force but not enough to get through the defense system.
It’s important to not that Iran did not attack the troops in either Syria or Iraq but rather a heavily fortified base that enjoys support by the Gulf Nations.
Three Iranian officials familiar with the plans said that Iran gave advanced notice that attacks were coming, as a way to minimize casualties. The officials said Iran symbolically needed to strike back at the U.S. but at the same time carry it out in a way that allowed all sides an exit ramp; they described it as a similar strategy to 2020 when Iran gave Iraq heads up before firing ballistic missiles at an American base in Iraq following the assassination of its top general.
If that's what it takes for a diplomatic resolution, I'm all for that.
Do you think Israel wants the US to pursue a diplomatic resolution, though?
reply
52 sats \ 0 replies \ @Cje95 OP 11h
I actually think yes that if the nuclear element is gone and Iran’s regime talks to Israel directly Israel will be much more open to peace.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @BlokchainB 8h
Yeah I thought it was a save face attack thank god no Americans were hurt
reply
132 sats \ 0 replies \ @Cje95 OP 8h
Yeah I think it’s clear that Iran isn’t going to poke a bear. Now it will be interesting to see how tightly it can control its proxies in Iraq… they have acted out of turn before and caused issues.
I also love how Iran said the number of missiles was the number of bombs but they forgot about the tomahawk cruise missiles in their math lol
reply