pull down to refresh

54 sats \ 6 replies \ @ek 29 Jun \ on: Poorman's Coinjoin Using Non-Custodial Lightning Swaps (No Node Required) bitcoin
If Boltz and SwapMarket are subpoenaed, can’t they link both UTXOs via the lightning invoice payment hash?
I assume most are trying to achieve privacy from the government, but then you should also include government attacks in your threat model.
write
preview
55 sats \ 0 replies \ @klk OP 29 Jun
Yes...
Boltz already supports paying BOLT12 invoices but they don't generate them for receiving. With that it would be pretty solid.
Until then, for that level of privacy, I would go with an intermediate LN node and a lnproxy wrapped invoice.
reply
30 sats \ 4 replies \ @SwapMarket 11 Jul
SwapMarket is not an entity. It is a static open source web app hosted at github. There are no logs there.
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @klk OP 11 Jul
Sure, but Middle Way or whatever's the provider might have some logs.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @SwapMarket 11 Jul
Sure. Boltz backend runs a postgres database, but it does not have to be in the same physical location and the records for the old swaps can be easily wiped. Logs too.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @klk OP 11 Jul
Yes, but as a user I can't rely on that without “trusting”.
reply
29 sats \ 0 replies \ @SwapMarket 11 Jul
Yup. Boltz repeatedly said they are not a privacy tool. Same goes for all their alternative backends.
reply