pull down to refresh

You absolutely have a legal claim in bankruptcy proceedings. A tokenized equity because it is merely price exposure will just go to zero.
You have no legal claim to securities in bankruptcy. There is already legal precedent established. The Great Taking -David Rogers Webb
"The new safe harbor regime was cemented into case law with the court proceedings around the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers. In the lead-up to the failure, JP Morgan (JPM) had taken client assets as a secured creditor while being the custodian for these client assets! Under longstanding bankruptcy law this would clearly have been a constructively fraudulent preference transfer benefitting an insider. And so, JPM was sued by clients whose assets were taken.
I will cite the following memorandum filed in defense of JPM by the law firm Wachtel, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, with the U.S. Bankruptcy court of the Southern District of New York [22]:
The purpose of the safe harbors, from their inception, has been to promote stability in large and inherently unstable financial markets by protecting transactions in those markets from being disturbed during a bankruptcy. As explained in the legislative history of the original safe harbor, “the financial stability of the clearing houses, with often millions of dollars at their disposal, would be severely threatened by” exposure to avoidance claims; as well, actions to avoid margin payments made by clearing houses could set off a “chain reaction” of insolvencies among all other market participants, “threatening the entire industry.”
Now here is the decision of the court [23] : UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: Chapter 11 Case No. 08-13555 The Court agrees with JPMC that the safe harbors apply here,...
reply
20 sats \ 6 replies \ @Cje95 1 Jul
Ya so since the CFTC and the SEC have approved of the Republic platform that's just not accurate. Maybe if it isn't approved but once it is well it is
reply
What legal precedence has been established that overrules the findings of the Lehman Brothers case? I’ll wait.
reply
90 sats \ 4 replies \ @Cje95 1 Jul
Uhhh we passed a whole lot of legislation that has completely changed the space since Lehman existed 😂 its like comparing an apple to a car 😂
reply
That court case proves (establishes legal precedence) that you do not have ownership of your stock in the event of the custodians bankruptcy. That law and legal precedence has not been overturned.
“Your” stock is owned by others (federal reserve banks) as collateral.
Stocks are just as fake as the fiat dollar.
Good morning sunshine.
reply
20 sats \ 2 replies \ @Cje95 2 Jul
That is not at all how the US government works so I can only assume you are not from or do not live here because we learn about this in elementary school.