pull down to refresh

77 sats \ 4 replies \ @justin_shocknet 7 Jul \ parent \ on: Would you insure your Bitcoin using AnchorWatch? AskSN
You have to use their hardware devices
This would defeat the purpose imo, may as well just use an insured custodian if you're doing "self-custody" with their infrastructure.
I think the product makes more sense for company treasuries where the investors demand this to mitigate key-man risk
Taproot being a huge mistake and relatively new, storing large amounts of coin in a tapscript isn't aligned to a risk-averse strategy either.
write
preview
102 sats \ 3 replies \ @1fatmess 7 Jul
Taproot being a huge mistake and relatively new, storing large amounts of coin in a tapscript isn't aligned to a risk-averse strategy either.
This is hilarious and ridiculous FUD given the bitcoin you deposit with anchorwatch is literally insured.
reply
102 sats \ 2 replies \ @justin_shocknet 7 Jul
The insurance is meant for operational fuck-ups, if their entire portfolio of insurees get pwned that's Force majeure.
Cope harder shitcoiner.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @1fatmess 10 Jul
Christ, bit touchy aren’t we, tubby?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @justin_shocknet 10 Jul
literally insured
It must be hard using the Internet as a retard, but get some parental supervision before posting
Enjoy your shitcoins
reply