pull down to refresh

People seem to be getting mixed results:
Im hearing its routing to dumber faster model and getting some things wrong then if you ask "think" it gets it right. #1071526 seems to mention some of that routing behavior so im sure they will be tweaking that as they get more data from people using it
These are suposed leaked system prompts:
If you read the comments people point out they dont mention how they were leaked and it seems to be missing things that would probally be there so take it with a grain of salt
What have you used it for so far? Is it a hit or a miss? Is it a better AI agent?
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @carter OP 17h
People seem to still be hatin it and especially hate they cant use 4o now. Sam says hes gonna bring it back for pro people https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1mkae1l/gpt5_ama_with_openais_sam_altman_and_some_of_the/n7nelhh/
reply
Sam says hes gonna bring it back for pro people
Rolled out too fast. Haha!
reply
Really hard for any single person to evaluate on a small sample size
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @carter OP 23h
of course you are right im really looking for anecdotal evidence :)
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @gmd 20h
haven't had a lot of time to play with it yet. these models are like trading your really smart friend for a different slightly smarter friend with a different personality...
reply
35 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 23h
There's another note in #1071526 regarding "Instruction Hierarchy Evaluation"
We note regressions in performance for gpt-5-main. We will follow up with a fix to improve these behaviors.
that may explain
Im hearing its routing to dumber faster model and getting some things wrong then if you ask "think" it gets it right
reply
This mentions some svg it made that look pretty good https://simonwillison.net/2025/Aug/7/gpt-5/ much better than some I tried to make with GTP3
reply
deleted by author