pull down to refresh

As for government revenues, the primary source is tax collection, with the majority coming from individuals and families. Individual taxes represented 8.4% of GDP in 2024, while corporate taxes were 1.8%, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).
Don't think me as a big fan of taxes. Ultimately it's the consumer who has to pay the price. However when I compare US's with India's tax revenue generated in the last years, it seems a lot opposite.
1.) India's corporate tax is not declining, 2.) the individual income tax is paid by only 2.2% of the total population.
Anyways...Trump has come up with a corporate tax but by another name.
The spike in tariffs is obviously a huge change that is generating a lot of cash for the Treasury. The U.S. collected $162 billion in revenue from tariffs in the calendar year through September 10, according to the Bipartisan Policy Center.
And....
The question is where the money is coming from. In other words, are tariffs more of a corporate tax or a consumer tax?
Currently, the answer seems to be the latter. The second-quarter U.S. corporate earnings season indicated that many, though not all companies, are passing a significant portion of the tariffs on to their customers in the form of higher prices.
So, basically it's a stealth corporate tax, a good plan by Trump.

Are Americans already enjoying the Maganomics??

Rothbard was mostly right when he said that the level of taxation matters more than the form of taxation.
reply
Yes, every anarcho capitalist would argue for a tax free state. I'm sure there are few..
reply
Even a great big statist like @SimpleStacker might agree with that Rothbard point. ;)
reply
Hey, I'm only the second biggest statist on SN. The biggest is @Cje95... he literally works for the feds
Rothbard was mostly right when he said that the level of taxation matters more than the form of taxation.
Is this a Rothbard thing? I thought we all learn this in Econ 101
reply
@Cje95 isn't an economist. Clearly, you're the most statist economist here (and probably only here).
No, it's not a Rothbard exclusive. It's just a point he would often make when political debates got really focused on comparing forms of taxation.
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @Cje95 2h
lol I have no idea what I’ve been drug into but I swear I’m innocent! I just relay what the halls of Congress are talking about!
Though if you use the practically obsolete definition of it “ A statesman; a politician; one skilled in government.” I will say I would be one of the top people here for that 🫡
reply
Take it as you like. SimpleStacker was just feebly trying to deflect.
reply
And even a peasant or plumber or any low income person wouldn't argue the state for corporate taxes if he gets 100% tax rebate on his income.
reply
Right, but that's why understanding tax incidence is important.
reply
Most people are dumb in the world, and more than most are dumb in India.
I'm completely against any forms of taxes levied on public or on businesses by government. Am I anarchist? No, I'm not against the state or government. I'm just saying that the state or government should earn for themselves by using the resources like land and international trade they have got under their belt.
Taxation in any form is just a pick pocket way.
reply