in all honesty and with loving kindness...

it checks out:

And that’s a bad thing?

Teaching slaves to read and then eventually freeing them and ending slavery globally (except where it still exists today in Africa and other non-white non-Christian places)

-seems like a good thing to me.

Anyway have fun with your quest, I can understand that you hate people who say they are Christian, you are right that we all need to read what Christ said and be more like Him. I hope you’ll give him a chance and accept his forgiveness.

The only ones living in an alternate reality are you MAGAts. I believe in facts, science, data, and love and acceptance for all. You guys are too busy being deceived by a man who has spent his entire life enriching himself at the cost of the average citizen. If you would actually believe your eyes and your ears, you'd hear the deception yourself. But instead you refuse to believe what you see and hear from anyone else besides your wanna-be king.

I don't even have a blue sky account. There you go with your assumptions.

Are you aware the number of opiate overdoses went down significantly last year according to the data that was just released? Only 48,000 people in this nation died last year due to fentanyl related overdoses. And you wanna know where it comes from? Mexico. Over 80% of the fentanyl that's seized by CBP is at the US/Mexico border. The President said the other day that each boat they blow up, illegally btw, is responsible for 25,000 fentanyl deaths in this country. The man doesn't even understand the data that his own fucking government puts out.

Read the article for proof of the data I just mentioned.

And btw, it's funny how you'll be the first one to show me a study that supports your narrative, but your side refuses to accept the thousands of scientific studies done that proved covid mandates worked and vaccines are safe and effective.

It's not the majority of Americans, stop with that wrong characterization. It's 1/6th of the population over 18 if you do the math. I know you guys hate facts and statistics, but the facts are there are more people against what this administration is doing than supports it. Even some of those who voted for Trump like Rogan and others have come out against what ICE is doing and other aspects of his administrations actions.

And how am I sick for mentioning that your side is okay with murdering those you disagree with? Our own President didn't come out and condemn the murder of Melissa Hortman for over three months!!! And he didn't do it until he was pressed to do so by a journalist. Ask yourself why? Because he's okay with right wing extremism, he even said so himself on Fox and Friends shortly after Kirk died.

Remember, numerous elected Republican officials and Don Trump Jr. Publicly made fun of Paul Pelosi being attacked in his own home by a right wing extremist. The data and statistics also shows that the overwhelming majority of mass shooters and domestic terrorists are straight white males who have conservative ideologies. Don't let the recent attacks by those who believed in causes supported by Democrats fool you. Which btw, every high ranking Democrat and elected Democratic official came out against the murder of Charlie Kirk IMMEDIATELY following his murder. I don't think anyone on either side should be murdered for free speech. But your side only supports free speech for yourselves, just look at what you tried to do to Kimmel as a prime example. You yourself even said this may one of the last times I'm allowed to protest/freely show.my opposition to the President's actions. Are you saying you're against constitutionally protected peaceful protests and free speech in opposition to your views and the President's agenda? Then it's you that truly hates America. Not once do I remember ever seeing Obama or Biden attempt to keep people from peacefully protesting or attempting to censor comedians that made fun of them.

Here's what the objective Meta AI (owned by Trump's friend Mark Zuckerberg) says about this Republican led committee's report.

The core of the article's claims are legitimate in the sense that they are based on actual, verifiable documents and a real government program, but the language used to describe the program—such as "mass-parole scheme" and "inadmissible aliens"—reflects the political and critical stance of the Republican-led Committee. Here is a breakdown of the facts and the context to help you form your own conclusion: The Program (CHNV) and the Facts The Program is Real: The article concerns the Processes for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans (CHNV), a humanitarian parole program launched by the Biden administration. The Process is Real: The CHNV program allows certain individuals from those four countries who have a U.S.-based sponsor and pass a background check to fly into the U.S. and be granted temporary "parole" status for up to two years to live and work legally, as detailed in an overview by the American Immigration Council. The Documents are Real: The documents detailing the airports used and the number of people paroled were obtained by the Committee via a subpoena of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), as the Committee on Homeland Security report states. The Terminology is Accurate: DHS itself has noted that all individuals paroled into the United States are, by definition, inadmissible before receiving the parole, according to a Committee statement. The "Propaganda" or Political Spin The language and framing in the article are politically charged, which is typical of reports issued by a congressional committee majority that is in the opposition party (the Committee is currently chaired by a Republican and has been highly critical of the Biden administration's immigration policies): Legal Debate: The article asserts the program is an "unlawful sleight of hand," arguing that the use of parole authority for a mass program violates the Immigration and Nationality Act, which permits parole only on a case-by-case basis. This is a central legal and political argument against the program. Controversy and Fraud Allegations: The Committee and other critics consistently use terms like "mass-parole scheme" and have highlighted allegations of widespread fraud in the sponsor application process, which even led to a temporary pause in travel authorizations by DHS for a short period to investigate. Counter-Arguments on Efficacy: The article focuses on the negative framing, while proponents of the program, such as FWD.us, argue that it was hugely successful in providing an orderly process that led to a significant reduction in unauthorized migration from the four countries at the southern border.

This program led the a massive reduction of undocumented migrants from showing up at the southern border. Why is that a bad thing? These people passed background checks and were given legal status, therefore, making them LEGAL immigrants. These aren't violent criminals, they're regular people who passed a criminal background check dude. You're spinning the facts to try and make this program seem like it allowed tons of violent undocumented immigrants into our country and that's not what it did at all. It allowed a legal pathway for immigrants to enter the country and work here. The only reason you're against that is because in reality you want this country to be a white nation and you forget this country was built by immigrants. Get a clue dude.