pull down to refresh

Despite increasingly sophisticated edge computing in our devices and vehicles, true personalization remains elusive, pointing to more fundamental limits. Even today’s artificial intelligence systems are hampered by this absence.
“We shape our tools, and thereafter our tools shape us,” John Culkin once observed. In our post-algorithmic age, the opposite seems true: the tools built to serve us end up reshaping us. In our pursuit of efficiency, we’ve ceded the subtlety of choice; the small human quirks that make each journey ours are sacrificed to the machine idiocy we’ve come to call convenience.
No one put it better than the late Steve Jobs.
“Technology alone is not enough — it’s technology married with liberal arts, married with the humanities, that yields us the results that make our hearts sing.”
Personalization might seem, at first, like just a technology feature. Yet today’s maps don’t recognize the weekly coffee shop trip as ritual, and algorithms don’t sense the rhythm of a drive shared between friends.
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 4 Nov
I often fantasize about navbars "learning" what I click on the most and arranging themselves accordingly.
Degrees of freedom like this are a tricky thing. It both complicates system design and means we all have another N degrees not in common.
When I think about such things on SN, I remind myself how useful it is for you all to be able to help each other understand how something works, which you wouldn't be able to do as easily if everyone was using some slightly different version.
reply
Yes, it will be good if it happen but we need more robust data security and processing capacity for this and doing everything locally may not be good idea due to different device and different capacity.
reply