Our investigation into the suspicious pressure on Archive.today \ stacker news ~security

pull down to refresh

Our investigation into the suspicious pressure on Archive.today adguard-dns.io/en/blog/archive-today-adguard-dns-block-demand.html

706 sats \ 9 comments \ @nout 19h security

view all related items

100 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby 15h

23 sats \ 6 replies \ @optimism 17h

Here's the subpoena: https://pdflink.to/1e0e0ecd/

100 sats \ 5 replies \ @SwapMarket 16h

Wow, who disclosed its existence? And what can a website registrar furnish besides the (fake) name, address and IP?

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @optimism 16h

who disclosed its existence?

The @archiveis Twitter account, in a tweet saying "canary"

And what can a website registrar furnish besides the (fake) name, address and IP?

The tor exit node you used to log in to their site, haha. (and your payment details)

100 sats \ 3 replies \ @SwapMarket 15h

I hope they paid with bitcoin from a non-KYC UTXO. But the subpoena was sent to the domain registrar and/or vps manager, so they must have disclosed it?

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 15h

Yeah, I think they may disclose it because it says it's not confidential?

100 sats \ 1 reply \ @SwapMarket 13h

69 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 13h

Requested, not ordered?

23 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 18h

Their website is webabusedefense.com, and here is the archived version as of November 7.

The irony