pull down to refresh

Oh lord.
Old news by now (#1291762, #1297459) but still funny.
Yeah. Look. “We are selling billions of dollars of stock at a premium to NAV to buy Bitcoin, which always goes up” is in quite a few respects a great story to tell, you know, Strategy stock enthusiasts. “We are selling a billion dollars of stock at NAV to pay interest on the loans we previously took out to buy Bitcoin” is considerably less fun.

Strategy Inc. (formerly MicroStrategy Inc.) invented the idea of the digital asset treasury company, that is, the idea that the stock market should pay $2 for $1 worth of crypto. At its peak in July, Strategy owned 601,550 Bitcoins, worth about $71.4 billion, and had an equity market capitalization of about $127 billion and an enterprise value of about $139 billion, or roughly twice the value of its Bitcoins.

"WHY was $1 of Bitcoin in Strategy's hands worth $2?"

Honestly, nobody knows, but the (podcast/inflooenzors) scammers on Twitter or Wall Street gave you plenty of stories:
This is the cringiest to read knowing where the story ends:
Strategy is a public company, and it borrowed money in safe, long-term, no-margin-call, corporate sorts of ways. It issued convertible bonds with low coupons, and then later it got into issuing perpetual preferred stock: Strategy could borrow money to buy Bitcoin and never pay the money back.
One by one, the imaginary stories for WHY mNAV>1?! died. Then Strategy collapsed to 1.15 mNAV, and
... can't sell more stock at a big premium to net asset value to buy more Bitcoin. Oh, I mean, it’s still selling stock and buying Bitcoin, or it was as of late last month anyway. But that is no longer especially accretive.
Second story (leverage) is still in play. No margin calls after bitcoin's -35%, but is Strategy doing, um, well? NOPE. Debt is expeeeensive -- 10-11% on the prefs.
That’s several hundred million dollars of payment obligations each quarter. (Because these are preferred stocks, the coupons are not technically payment obligations: They’re “dividends,” and Strategy can just not pay them. But that would be, you know, bad for its future capital markets strategy, and Strategy does not seem to be considering that option at this point.)
Strategy needs to pay coupons, and if Bitcoin is down and its stock is not trading at a premium anymore, where does it get the money to pay coupons? Well, an obvious answer would be from selling Bitcoins — Strategy does have a lot of Bitcoins — but that’s not ideal. “When Bitcoin prices drop, we have to sell Bitcoins to pay our lenders” is not quite the same as getting a margin call, but it’s not great either. In a downturn, Strategy’s leverage might not be as benign as it looked.
SOLUTION? uuuh, we're gonna pre-sell shares and sit on melting ice cube dollars so y'alls believe us and maybe keep handing over value in shareholder-accretive way (= you are the BTC yield they're after).
PLEEEAAASE just implode, already.

also a nice story of AI hacking blockchains there.
I don't see where exactly the implosion comes from, unless 600k BTC stops being a crazy war chest.
reply
I knooow. Maybe they'll squander the corn on stupid shit, maybe there'll be a rug or nationalization attempt
reply
That would certainly be a fun ride
reply
But, den, don't you know that they're building the world's first digital credit vehicle?
reply
I knooow :/
It's soo cool, I'm really just envious
reply
They aren't going to implode but the jig is up. They aren't going to be able to sell $1 of Bitcoin for $2 ever again. mNav probably trades between 0.9 and 1.2 for a number of years until they figure out how to be some sort of Bitcoin bank and have an actual business model besides selling shares.
I have said this before but I think even if they simply ran a large lightning node and earned some revenue off some Bitcoin the market would look at it positively. It would be a de minimis amount of revenue but the market would likely reward them for it. They should also build a best in class custody solution for Bitcoin only and charge funds and other large entities a fee to hold their bitcoin. That would have the added benefit of large entities diversifying away from Coinbase as a custodian.
reply