pull down to refresh
I highly doubt that would happen.
Read some history starting with Executive Order 6102.
Different time
Lol yeah at the start of USD hegemony as opposed near the end. Still makes no difference to the operative imperatives. Without USD hegemony today USA is bankrupt.
Most countries are bankrupt. global debt is at like $300T
If you are operating a country (or business) that is making a surplus (profit) debt can sometimes be a legitimate and logical way of funding more growth more quickly. If in contrast you are operating at a deficit (loss) then debt can become a toxic downward spiral into insolvency. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/07/business/china-trade-surplus.html Nearly all nations today have a trade deficit with China. Because China is the most competitive trading nation on earth and is using its surpluses and debt to expand its economic activity to ever further its advantage. In contrast the west is squandering its legacy advantage (eg USAs exceptional monetary privilege) by misusing fiat debt issuance to pump up non productive assets (mainly real estate) to create an illusion of wealth. The wealth of nations and their citizens depends to a large extent upon good government.
Wrong once agin.
Then he is a coward. He actively promotes and uses BTC as a speculative commodity which is precisely the narrative the bankers and government have allowed because it neutralises any threat to their fiat MoE monopoly and turns Bitcoin into just another harmless, KYCed and taxed commodity.
How? It’s an open protocol!
Yes it is an open protocol and the destiny of the protocol is shaped by how it is used and everyone who uses it shapes that destiny. The narrative that Bitcoin is a speculative commodity and not a P2P payments protocol shifts the effect and impact of the protocol from one challenging and providing an alternative to fiat money, to one that is effectively captured and controlled by fiat money.
Those who want to use it p2p will Saylor can’t stop that
Yes but he promotes the narrative that p2p is not important. He promotes the narrative of hoarding-speculating commodity not MoE. MoE is the function of Bitcoin that threatens the fiat MoE monopoly. Saylor is a fiat debt slavery cuck and so are you if you agree with and defend him..
If saylor went on all the shows day after day, like he currently does, and promoted bitcoin as a ‘tool for freedom’ and medium of exchange he would get calls from the government.
Saylor knows exactly what Bitcoin is but he has to be careful what he says. Just my 2 sats